Only Prove in Court

Allegations of extortion and abuse of power case involving Bibit Samad Rianto and Chandra M Hamzah should be brought to justice. However, the Attorney General should dare to demand free both if was not enough evidence.

"Message of the President to resolve this matter outside the court was too late and no longer relevant to be implemented," said former Chairman Adnan Buyung Nasution Eight team on Saturday (09/10/2010) in Jakarta.

Eight teams or Independent Verification Team Facts and Legal Process upon Bibit-Chandra, in November 2009, recommended the termination of legal proceedings against seed-Chandra because there is not enough evidence. However, the Attorney General's use of sociological reasons when issuing an assessment cessation of prosecution (SKPP) Seeds-Chandra.

Decision of the Supreme Court on Friday rejected an application for review cases filed by Seed-Chandra Attorney General makes SKPP Seed-Chandra declared invalid until his case should be run.

Pitcher admitted that he had predicted the decision of the Supreme Court because SKPP should be issued with legal considerations, such as not enough evidence, not a criminal act, or the suspect died. "The reason is only used for the waiver of sociological case (deponeering)," Buyung said, adding, current conditions make the work of Eight Teams become meaningless.

Buyung hope, the case-Chandra Seeds are brought to justice. If found they had been committed Seeds and Chandra, it should not be seen as an attempt weakening the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK).

Conversely, as a form of legal and moral responsibility, the Attorney General should dare to demand free if no evidence.

Former members of Eight other teams, Todung Mulya Lubis, said similar things. Seeds and Chandra do not need to ask Attorney General to deponeering their case. Both should be ready to face legal proceedings. "If it was not wrong, no need to beg for termination of the case. Let's face it in court, "said Todung Mulya Lubis.

"SKPP was a sissy. It is a source of trouble. Seed and the Chandra Better prepare yourself to the court, "he said.

DPP Chairman delivered the opinion of the same Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle Legal Affairs and Human Rights Trimedya Panjaitan. "Seeds and Chandra do not be afraid to court. Because, from the trial Anggodo Widjojo, no evidence of extortion involving Seeds and Chandra, "he said.

KPK also will be free from such accusations have a debt of gratitude from the government, if Bibit-Chandra brought to justice. That accusation was made KPK visits have been held hostage and could no longer be independent of government.

Members of the House Commission III, Bambang Soesatyo, said the rejection of the Supreme Court was increasingly weakened and reduced public confidence to the Commission that its image continues to decline because unable to resolve major cases, such as Century Bank. "Ideally, the Attorney General was not issued SKPP, but deponeering," he said.

Criminal Law Experts UI, Indriyanto Seno Adji, said, in addressing the Supreme Court decision, the AGO can wait Anggodo cases permanent legal force. When the Supreme Court still punish Anggodo, Attorney General could issue new SKPP Seeds-Chandra.

Acting Attorney General Darmono said, as applicable, there are two alternatives that could be the prosecutor, that is delegated the case to court and deponeering as the authority of the Attorney General. Deponeering steps can be taken if there are suggestions from the House, MA, and the President.
Source : JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "Only Prove in Court"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus